Why numbers matter
This information was obtained from the Air Force Association, a large group of U.S. AIR FORCE fans, not a part of the U.S. Air
Force, but dedicated to the USAF through former service or just plain patriotism to honor those who serve in the Nationís Air Force
with such distinction. The corresponding organizations for the other U.S. Armed Services are the U.S. Navy League (which includes
support of the U.S. Coast Guard), the Association of the U.S. Army, and The U.S. Marine Corps League. Neither require former service
in any military branch as requirements for membership. Each does a good job of acquainting its members with the mission, condition,
and objectives of the armed service each represents. Because each lobbies the Congress, membership is typically denied an active duty
member of the Armed Services to avoid conflict with the Hatch Act.
This article does a good job of explaining the need for our ...1. military planners (who plan the use of our military inventory in
combat), ....2. Members of the U.S. Congress (who appropriate the monies to pay for these expensive military assets in being, and
their readiness for use, and their INFORMED staffs for current advice), and ....3. a Commander-in-Chief who understands the complexities
of carrying out what he/she may choose to order U.S. Armed Forces to do to protect the security interests of America. That is why it
helps for those involved to be AWARE of the innards of modern warfare.
Less than 30% of the current Members of Congress have EVER served in the U.S. Military services, and even fewer have had any of their
offspring serve in the U.S. Military (both John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Paln have sons serving now). During elections, I tend
to evaluate a candidate for Federal office on their ability to make informed decisions on the use of taxpayer money to defend the U.S. After
all, that is the most important Constitutional duty of the Federal Government (remember it says..."PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE."
/S/ LeRoy Collins, Jr.
Friday, August 29, 2008
AFA Members, Congressional Staffers, Civic Leaders, and DOCA Members, below is a short tutorial on how air campaign planners look at the
problem of building strike packages and putting the right set of weapons on the right targets. The first thing I want you to notice
is - in the real world, not every aircraft possessed is mission ready. The second thing to remember is for an operation to run smoothly,
the maintenance schedule must be met ... and there must be spare aircraft set-aside in order to keep flight integrity and to avoid
missing targets. Thirdly, you should never think in terms of a one-time strike. Air planners understand a single strike is the most
ineffective way to use airpower - you have to plan for a continuing campaign. Fourthly, the numbers you are going to see are similar
to the ones in the real world ... but are not the actual numbers. Fifthly, I will not include support aircraft in the example ... because
it gets complex very quickly.
Next week, I will send you a simple Air Defense problem for fighters.
As always, I look forward to your comments.
For your consideration,
Michael M. Dunn, Lt Gen (Ret)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Scenario -- B-2 Mission from Whiteman AFB, MO against a fictional nuclear power plant in the Middle East
A senior civilian defense official once asked me: How many aircraft can you generate for multiple strikes?
Total B-2s available: 20
Minus 2 in depot = 18
Minus 2 hard broke = 16
Minus 2 - various other maintenance reasons - Estimated time in Commission - parts +24 hours = 14+
Now let's assume the rest are close to being mission capable. The flight time to the target is 18 hours. Time difference between
Whiteman AFB and the target is +9+30. The B-2 can only penetrate a sophisticated airspace at night - in this example time-on-target
is 0030 (Middle East time)
Refer to this chart:
||Time -- Whiteman
||Time -- Middle East
|President orders attack
||D-3 -- 1400
||D-2 -- 2330
|Bombers begin generation; Crewmembers go into crew rest
||D-3 -- 1500
||D-1 -- 0430
||D-2 -- 1900
||D-1 -- 0430
||D-2 -- 2100
||D-1 -- 0630
|Time on Target
||D-1 -- 1500
||D-Day -- 0030
||D-Day -- 0900
||D-Day -- 1830
||D-1 -- 1900
||D-Day -- 0430
||D-1 -- 2100
||D-Day -- 0630
|Time on Target
||D-Day -- 1500
||D+1 -- 0030
||D+1 -- 0900
||D+1 -- 1830
||D-Day -- 1900
||D+1 -- 0430
|| D-Day -- 2100
||D+1 -- 0630
||Time on Target
||D+1 -- 1500
||D+2 -- 0030
||D+2 -- 0900
||D+2 -- 1830
||D+1 -- 1900
|| D+2 -- 0430
||D+1 -- 2100
||D+2 -- 0630
||Time on Target
||D+2 -- 1500
||D+3 -- 0030
||D+3 -- 0900
||D+3 -- 1830
Now a few observations.
- Note that the first flight returns - assuming no diverts, bad weather, etc - with 12 hours to go before the 3rd strike
takeoff. That means the plane has to be fully mission capable and turned in that time. Any degradation in combat capability
pushes a bird to the 4th strike.
- Same occurs for the aircraft on the 2nd strike - they are available for - the 4th strike ... at the earliest.
- If you put all your MC aircraft into the first strike, you have nothing for the second day. And you end up with strikes
every other day.
- Most decision makers think only in terms of single strikes and with a high percentage of your fleet participating in that
strike. They don't think about a continuing campaign, the possible need to return to the target. They don't consider the
need for spare aircraft, for problems with the tankers, with rendezvous, or with a myriad of other things that can go wrong.
- The decision maker who asked me was shocked when I told him that we could generate and fly about 4 aircraft per mission. I told
him that in the first days of a campaign, we could probably go with 6 aircraft - but over the long term - we could get only 4 per mission.
- I've read articles by some noted people who stated the Air Force did not want more B-2s. The fact is they fought hard to
buy more. SECAF Don Rice did everything in his power to convince the administration to keep the production line open. And ... I
can tell you that 17 years later ... anyone involved with building campaign plans wished we would have done so.
/s/ LeRoy Collins, Jr.